Nvidia, Microsoft, and a Secret Cartel? Xockets’ Bold Accusation

In partnership with

There’s a classic story playing out in the world of AI right now. A small startup called Xockets is suing tech giants Nvidia and Microsoft, accusing them of patent infringement and, even more alarmingly, forming a cartel to suppress innovation. This isn’t just a legal squabble over patents – it’s a reflection of the power dynamics that dominate modern technology.

It’s time to STOP using Honey and Credit Karma

• Ditch Honey: Kudos doubles your credit card rewards.

• Nerdwallet, but better: One app for all your cards.

• Simplify shopping: Autofill payments with a single click.

Download Now—It’s Free!

Xockets claims that Nvidia has infringed on its patented Data Processing Unit (DPU) technology, which accelerates data-heavy workloads in AI and cloud computing. Nvidia allegedly inherited this infringement through its acquisition of Mellanox in 2020, a company that Xockets says started infringing after a public demo in 2015. What’s more interesting is the accusation that Nvidia and Microsoft are using RPX, a group purportedly created to allow Big Tech to band together and drive down prices, monopolizing AI infrastructure in the process.

The Core Issue: Power and Leverage

The core of this dispute isn’t really about technology – it’s about power and leverage. Nvidia and Microsoft have a near-unquestioned dominance in the GPU market, especially in AI. If they can control the core infrastructure, they control the entire ecosystem. When a small startup like Xockets comes along with an innovative product, the big players have two choices: buy them or bury them.

Xockets alleges they chose the latter, using a strategy known as “efficient infringement.” It’s simple: you infringe on the patent, calculate the cost of a lawsuit, and decide it’s cheaper to fight in court than to pay for the tech upfront. You roll the dice, knowing you have the resources to outlast a startup in a legal battle. It’s not about who’s right; it’s about who can afford to keep the game going longer.

This is a classic case of Big Tech flexing its muscles – and it’s exactly what we’ve seen in recent years with antitrust cases against the likes of Google and Facebook. Consolidating power in emerging industries like AI is not just about competition; it’s about control over the future.

Cartels in the Innovation Economy?

The more disturbing accusation here is the cartel-like behavior. Xockets claims Nvidia and Microsoft, through RPX, are essentially coordinating to drive down the price of innovation. Think about that for a second: instead of competing to build a better product, they’re allegedly working together to crush small innovators, force prices down, and keep control in the hands of a few players. It’s like a rigged poker game where the house always wins.

This is the opposite of how an innovation economy should work. Progress thrives when small, nimble companies with fresh ideas can challenge the incumbents. But in a world where the big players collude to suppress competition, the incentives to innovate diminish. Why take the risk if the outcome is predetermined?

The Bigger Picture

The reason this case is so important is that it highlights the shifting nature of competition in the tech world. We’re no longer in the era of direct, head-to-head battles between giants. Instead, we’re seeing the quiet consolidation of power through acquisitions, alliances, and, apparently, cartels. The more that companies like Nvidia and Microsoft dominate AI infrastructure, the less space there is for new players to emerge.

Innovation isn’t just about inventing new technology. It’s about having the freedom to experiment, fail, and succeed without being crushed by an oligopoly. If the Xockets lawsuit holds water, it suggests that this freedom is under threat. The best ideas won’t rise to the top – they’ll be bought out or buried.

My Take: Navigating the Monopolization of Innovation

Here’s the fundamental lesson: in a system where the giants can collaborate to maintain control, the real innovation doesn’t happen where the most money is. It happens in the edges, in the places that these giants haven’t yet monopolized. If you’re an entrepreneur, the takeaway is simple: avoid playing in their sandbox. Don’t try to out-Nvidia Nvidia. Instead, focus on areas they don’t care about yet, and by the time they do, you’ve already built something they can’t easily copy.

And for those who control the infrastructure of the future – like Nvidia and Microsoft – they should be careful. Dominance is a trap. The more power you accumulate, the more you become entrenched in the status quo. Innovation will shift to areas you can’t predict, because innovation, by definition, is unpredictable.

The outcome of this case may shape the future of AI – but the real game is happening elsewhere, in places where the giants aren’t looking. And that’s where the next wave of breakthroughs will come from.